/LING
|
Update: February 24, 2023 The new version of Termout.org is now online, so this web site is now obsolete and will soon be dismantled. |
Lista de candidatos sometidos a examen:
1) rhetorical analysis (*)
(*) Términos presentes en el nuestro glosario de lingüística
1) Candidate: rhetorical analysis
Is in goldstandard
1
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt199 - : characterized by grammatical complexity (Eggins, 2004), this page of SG is easy to read because, for example, it is mostly written in active voice (only two examples of passive voice are found) and makes little use of nominalizations: "provide your audience with a better understanding" (M3, paragraph 2). In brief, this page of SG draws on several semiotic resources to enact interactions such as inviting students to write annotations. It expresses positions and attitudes toward who is addressed, mainly, a casual and friendly pedagogical orientation, and toward what is being representedthe area of rhetoric which is presented as accessible and engaging to the extent that readers are positioned as practitioners of rhetorical analysis: "Your job as a rhetorical analysts is ..." (M3, paragraph 2).
2
paper CO_ColombianAppliedLinguisticsJournaltxt199 - : audiences" (see [39]Figure 3). Lexical coherence is attained through repetition of words such as "rhetoric," "rhetorical analysis," and "you" and through the inclusion of words or nominal groups that are common in the semantic field of rhetoric: speech, politicians, audience, manipulate, position, move, and rhetorical analysis .
Evaluando al candidato rhetorical analysis:
rhetorical analysis
Lengua:
Frec: 13
Docs: 6
Nombre propio: / 13 = 0%
Coocurrencias con glosario:
Puntaje: 0.208 = ( + (1+0) / (1+3.8073549220576)));
Candidato aceptado
Referencias bibliográficas encontradas sobre cada término
(Que existan referencias dedicadas a un término es también indicio de terminologicidad.)| rhetorical analysis |
: Spicer-Escalante, M. (2005). Writing in two languages/living in two worlds: Rhetorical analysis of Mexican-American written discourse. In M. Farr (Ed.), Latino language and literacy in ethnolinguistic Chicago (pp. 217-244). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. |